Martin
Martin v. Muniz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GEORGE MARTIN,
Case No. 17-01690 BLF (PR)
11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; GRANTING
MOTION TO RESUBMIT W. MUNIZ, et al., EXHIBITS
16 Defendants. (Docket Nos. 149, 167)
19 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil 20 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials 21 at the Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). Plaintiff’s second 22 amended complaint (“SAC”) is the operative complaint in this 23 matter. Dkt. No. 129. After screening the SAC, the Court 24 ordered the matter to proceed on the Eighth Amendment claim 25 26 1 All page references herein are to the Docket (ECF) pages shown 27 in the header to each document and brief cited, unless otherwise with respect to Plaintiff’s pain management, including the denial 1 of corrective surgery to address the chronic pain, against 2 Defendants Dr. Kim R. Kumar, Dr.…