Martin

Martin v. Muniz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20205:17-cv-01690California7,592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE MARTIN,

Case No. 17-01690 BLF (PR)

11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; GRANTING

MOTION TO RESUBMIT W. MUNIZ, et al., EXHIBITS

16 Defendants. (Docket Nos. 149, 167)

19 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil 20 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials 21 at the Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). Plaintiff’s second 22 amended complaint (“SAC”) is the operative complaint in this 23 matter. Dkt. No. 129. After screening the SAC, the Court 24 ordered the matter to proceed on the Eighth Amendment claim 25 26 1 All page references herein are to the Docket (ECF) pages shown 27 in the header to each document and brief cited, unless otherwise with respect to Plaintiff’s pain management, including the denial 1 of corrective surgery to address the chronic pain, against 2 Defendants Dr. Kim R. Kumar, Dr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.