Cortese
Johnson v. Cortese
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
SCOTT JOHNSON,
Case No. 5:19-cv-02671-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFAULT v. JUDGMENT 10 JOHN J. CORTESE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 24 11 Defendants.
Plaintiff Scott Johnson brings this action against John Cortese and Izzet Yusuf Kufioglu (together, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53. See Compl. ¶¶ 27–40, Dkt. No. 1. Before the Court is Mr. Johnson’s Motion for Default Judgment seeking injunctive relief along with statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. Dkt. No. 24 (“Motion”). Defendants have not appeared in this matter, did not oppose or otherwise respond to the Motion, and failed to appear at the hearing on the Motion on December 10, 2020. Having considered Mr. Johnson’s papers…