Chung
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20204:19-cv-07562California10,986 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
STRIKE PORTIONS OF TRADE
WILSON CHUNG, et al., SECRET DISCLOSURE, DENYING
MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE
Defendants. ORDER, AND GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 136, 137, 141, 149, 154, 156, 158, 160
Before the court are defendants Plantronics Inc.’s (“Plantronics”) and Thomas Puorro’s (“Puorro”) motion to strike and challenge the sufficiency of plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc.’s California Code of Civil Procedure § 2019.210 trade secret designation. Dkt. 136 (the “motion to strike”). Also before the court is Plantronics’ motion for a protective order from pending discovery served by plaintiff. Dkt. 137 (the “motion for a protective order”). Defendants James He…