Chung

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20204:19-cv-07562California10,986 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

STRIKE PORTIONS OF TRADE

WILSON CHUNG, et al., SECRET DISCLOSURE, DENYING

MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE

Defendants. ORDER, AND GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

SEAL

Re: Dkt. Nos. 136, 137, 141, 149, 154, 156, 158, 160

Before the court are defendants Plantronics Inc.’s (“Plantronics”) and Thomas Puorro’s (“Puorro”) motion to strike and challenge the sufficiency of plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc.’s California Code of Civil Procedure § 2019.210 trade secret designation. Dkt. 136 (the “motion to strike”). Also before the court is Plantronics’ motion for a protective order from pending discovery served by plaintiff. Dkt. 137 (the “motion for a protective order”). Defendants James He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.