Pearce

Avaya Inc. v. Pearce

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20203:19-cv-00565California1,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AVAYA INC., Case No. 19-cv-00565-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

v. RETAIN CONFIDENTIALITY OF

COUNTERFEIT ANALYSIS

RAYMOND BRADLEY PEARCE, et al., DOCUMENTS AND GRANTING

MOTIONS TO SEAL

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 231, 232, 233

13 On December 9, 2020, plaintiff Avaya Inc. (“Avaya”) filed an Administrative Motion to 14 Retain Confidentiality of the Highly Confidential and Confidential versions of the document produced by Avaya bates-numbered AVAYA0001197-1209 (the “Counterfeit Analysis”), both of which were attached as Exhibits A and B respectively to the Declaration of Lisa McCann. The full document has been produced to defense counsel, but its designation precludes counsel from showing the unredacted document to their clients. Avaya contends that the information at issue is extremely sensitive because the Counterfeit Analysis sets forth how Avaya analyzes a product to determine whether it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.