Blissard

Blissard v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20204:19-cv-02437California4,803 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN B.,

Case No. 19-cv-02437-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 20 Defendant.

Plaintiff John B. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied his application for benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1382 et seq. [Docket Nos. 17 (“Pltf. Mot.”), 22 (“Reply”).] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 20 (“Def. Mot.”).] For the reasons stated below, the court denies Plaintiff’s motion and grants the Commissioner’s cross motion. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits on February 11, 2015, alleging a disability onset date of February 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.