Bautista

Bautista v. Juul Labs, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20204:20-cv-01613California3,766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIA DE LA LUZ BAUTISTA-PEREZ, Case No. 20-cv-01613-HSG et al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 82 10 JUUL LABS, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Juul Labs, Inc.’s (“JLI”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 79, “Motion”) Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 78, “FAC”). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion with leave to amend as to the claims against JLI.2 I. BACKGROUND On July 3, 2019, the Coalition for Reasonable Vaping Regulation (“CRVR”) was incorporated for the purpose of “advocating for the enforcement of strong and coherent laws, regulations and policies which will prevent the use of e-cigarettes and other tobacco products by youth under the age of 21, while allowing adults the choice to continue purchasing these products 21 1 Defendant Coalition for Reasonable Vaping Regulation (“CRVR”) filed a joinder through which 22 it seeks to join JLI’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.