City and County of San Francisco v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20203:18-cv-07591California2,907 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
No. 20-73430
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,
Petitioner, vs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA,
Respondent,
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; THE PEOPLE OF THE
STATE OF CALIOFRNIA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH SAN
FRANCISCO CITY ATTORNEY DENNIS J. HERRERA,
Real Party in Interest.
STATEMENT OF DISTRICT COURT JUDGE CHARLES R.
BREYER IN RESPONSE TO MANDAMUS PETITION
United States District Court 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-73430
IN RE TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
STATEMENT OF DISTRICT
COURT JUDGE CHARLES R.
BREYER
IN RESPONSE TO MANDAMUS PETITION
Respondent District Court appreciates the opportunity to comment further on the issues raised in the Petition filed by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (“Teva”). See Petition (dkt. 1-3). Chiefly, in its Petition, Teva asserts the District Court committed clear legal error and abused its discretion when it found that Plaintiffs made a prima facie showing that Teva and its subsidiaries are alter-egos for the sake of establishing…