Huang

Huang v. Ge

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20205:19-cv-02132California7,077 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

XUEFENG HUANG, Case No. 19-CV-02132-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT

v. JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 55(c) & RULE 60(b) BAOLIN GE,

Defendant. 17 Defendant Baolin Ge (“Defendant”) moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) and 60(b) to set aside the Court’s entry of default judgement against Defendant. ECF No. 95 (“Mot.”). The Court held a hearing on this motion on November 5, 2020. ECF No. 115. Having considered the parties’ submissions, oral argument, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND

1 Defendant’s docket entry for ECF No. 95 is titled “Motion under Rule 55(c) and Rule 60(b) seeking Vacation of Judgment and Vacation of Order Dismissing Counterclaim.” However, Defendant’s motion does not challenge the Court’s order dismissing Defendant’s counterclaim, and no argument is presented in favor of vacating that order. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.