Durham v. Sachs Electric Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20205:18-cv-04506California6,050 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 WILLIAM DURHAM, et al., Case No. 18-cv-04506-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS;

v. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

IN PART MOTION FOR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SACHS ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., [Re: ECF 47, 53]

Defendants. 7 This action arises out of Plaintiff William Durham and the proposed class members’ employment by Defendant Sachs Electric Company (“Sachs”) at the California Flats Solar Project. Now before the Court is Sachs’ motions for judgment on the pleadings and for partial summary judgment. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“MJOP”), ECF 47; Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“MSJ”), ECF 53. The Court held a hearing on these motions on November 12, 2020. For the reasons explained during the hearing and discussed below, the Court GRANTS Sachs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Sachs’ motion for partial summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND Durham is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.