Ozkay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ESER OZKAY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08263-JST

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

v. 9 Re: ECF No. 13 EQUITY WAVE LENDING, INC., et al., Defendants.

12 Having granted Plaintiffs’ ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, at issue now is the Court’s order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue to continue to restrain and enjoin the sale of Plaintiffs’ Property pending trial in this action. ECF No. 13. To be entitled to a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must satisfy the familiar four-factor test: A plaintiff “must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.” Am. Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)). To grant…