Harris

Harris v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20204:17-cv-03269California659 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAURICE L. HARRIS, Case No. 17-cv-03269-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

ANCILLARY JURISDICTION OVER

v. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

RON DAVIS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 63 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison, filed the instant civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request that the Court retain ancillary jurisdiction over the settlement agreement. Dkt. No. 63. The Court DENIES this request for the following reasons. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On November 10, 2020, the Court dismissed this action with prejudice pursuant to the November 6, 2020 Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)), executed by both Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 61, 62. In the Order of Dismissal, the Court did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.