RG Abrams Insurance v. The Law Office of C.R. Abrams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 RG ABRAMS INSURANCE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01379-JST (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 61 THE LAW OFFICE OF C.R. ABRAMS, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Now pending before the court are a pair of jointly filed letter briefs setting forth a number of discovery disputes which essentially boil down to Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of certain discovery. The first letter brief (dkt. 55) was little more than an embodiment of the fact that the Parties had failed to meet and confer in any meaningful fashion, and that they had instead chosen to use the court as a forum for leveling a large number of generalized complaints pertaining to a number of poorly described discovery requests which were not attached to the letter brief. Accordingly, the court conducted a hearing (dkt. 58) at which the Parties were admonished to meet and confer in a meaningful manner, following which, they were instructed to jointly file another…