Ramachandran
Ramachandran v. Best Best & Krieger
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 20-cv-03693-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING MAY 6, 2021
v. HEARING AND GRANTING MOTION
TO AMEND COMPLAINT
BEST BEST & KRIEGER, et al., [Re: ECF 85] Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Satish Ramachandran (“Plaintiff”) moves this Court for leave to file a First 14 Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Best Best & Krieger, LLP; Christopher Diaz; 15 Christina Hickey; Kirk Ballard; David Kornfield; Christopher Jordan; and Pamela Jacobs 16 (“Defendants”). See Mot., ECF 85; see also Declaration of John Houston Scott, ECF 85-1. 17 Defendant Jacobs opposes on the limited grounds that Plaintiff should not be permitted to amend 18 the complaint prior to the resolution of the pending motions to dismiss in this case that are set to 19 be heard on January 14, 2021. See Opp’n, ECF 86. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court 20 finds the matter suitable for submission without oral argument and hereby VACATES the…