Drevalera

Drevalera v. Justices of the California Court of Appeal for the First District, Division Four

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20203:20-cv-07017California848 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TATYANA EVGENIEVNA

DREVALEVA,

No. C 20-07017 WHA Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA AND JUDGMENT

COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva seeks to sue several justices of the California Court of Appeal in forma pauperis and objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation of dismissal with prejudice for frivolity. For the reasons below, the complaint is DISMISSED. Following termination of her employment with the Alameda Health System, Ms. Drevaleva filed several suits in California state court. These appear to have been dismissed and the appeals unsuccessful. Ms. Drevaleva now seeks writs of mandamus and prohibition against four justices of the California Court of Appeal, accusing the justices of, among others, “abuse and usurpation of power,” “conspiring with criminal Defendants,” and “intentionally …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.