Declue
Declue v. Family Law Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALAN DECLUE, Case No. 20-cv-05808-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND AND ORDERING
FAMILY LAW SERVICES, et al., PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 11, 47, 51, 60, 63, 66
Before the court is plaintiff Alan DeClue’s (“plaintiff”) motion for leave to amend his complaint. Dkt. 63; Dkt. 66 (re-noticing motion for hearing). The matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court DENIES the motion. Separately, for the reasons provided below, the court also ORDERS plaintiff to show cause why his claims against the remaining defendants in this action should not be dismissed for failure to timely effect service. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated the instant action on August 18, 2020. Dkt. 1 (Compl.). In it, …