McCulloch

McCulloch v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20203:19-cv-07716California6,613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KRISTIN E. MCCULLOCH, Case No. 19-cv-07716-SI

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS OF FACT AND

v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; ORDER

DENYING DEFENDANT’S

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT OBJECTION TO EXTRINSIC

INSURANCE COMPANY, EVIDENCE

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 43 12 Plaintiff Kristin E. McCulloch challenges Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company’s (“Hartford Life”) denial of plaintiff’s long-term disability (“LTD”) claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et. seq. On December 4, 2020, the Court held a bench trial. Currently before the Court are parties’ cross motions for judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52. The parties have agreed that the proper standard of review is de novo. Dkt. Nos. 34 at 17; 35 at 2. This order comprises the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a). For the reasons set forth below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.