Farhang
Farhang v. Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 M.A. MOBILE LTD., Case No. 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR WRIT OF
v. EXECUTION, CONTEMPT, SEALING INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Re: Dkt. Nos. 705, 706, 708 KHARAGPUR, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Defendant Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (“IIT”) previously requested a writ of execution, a debtor examination, and sanctions against plaintiff M.A. Mobile LTD for its failure to pay a judgment. I denied M.A. Mobile a stay of the imposition of those costs pending appeal, Dkt. No. 688, but deferred ruling on the motions until the Ninth Circuit resolved all appeals, Dkt. No. 700. I granted IIT’s motion on December 3, 2020, after the appeals resolved. Dkt. No. 704. In that order, I granted the writ of execution and permitted a judgment debtor examination as overseen by a Magistrate Judge. I directed IIT to submit a revised proposed order that updated the amount of interest to which it was entitled. I permitted IIT to submit a request…