Mendez-Barocio

Mendez-Barocio v. Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20215:20-cv-06109California1,373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN MENDEZ-BAROCIO, Case No. 20-06109 EJD 11 Petitioner,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING v. RECONSIDERATION; DISMISSING PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT

WILLIAM BARR, et al., Respondents. (Docket Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)

17 On September 1, 2020, Petitioner, a detainee being held at the Mersa Verde ICE Processing Center, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Dkt. No. 5. Along with the petition, Petitioner filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), Dkt. No. 6, a motion for stay of removal, Dkt. No. 7, a motion for a temporary restraining order, Dkt. No. 8, a motion to appoint counsel, Dkt. No. 9, and a motion requesting that exhibits filed in a previous action be filed into this action, Dkt. No. 10. At the same time, Petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee. Dkt. No. 13. For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.