Khan
Khan v. Payton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MUHAMMAD KHAN,
Case No. 20-03086 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION v. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT;
STAYING BRIEFING; DENYING
M. PAYTON, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME AS MOOT
Defendant. 16 (Docket Nos. 14, 15)
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against an officer at San Quentin State Prison. Dkt. No. 1. On September 9, 2020, the Court found the complaint stated three cognizable claims, but dismissed the First Amendment retaliation claim with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 12. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed, with the advisement that failure to respond in the time provided would result in the action proceeding solely on the cognizable claims. Id. at 5. When the…