Keith Bohren v. City of San Jose
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ROXANNE BOHREN, Case No. 20-cv-04529-BLF Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
IN PART AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO
SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., AMEND IN PART Defendants. 12 Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. ECF 13, 30. The Court has determined that the motions are appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the hearing on the motions scheduled for January 28, 2021, is VACATED. Based on the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motions WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART and WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART. Plaintiff Roxanne Bohren1 filed the instant putative class action on July 8, 2020. ECF 1. The next day, she filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) against the City of San Jose, San Jose Police Officer Avila, Badge #4407 (“Officer Avila”), and the County of Santa Clara alleging (1) …