Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20213:17-cv-04738California10,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC, Case No. 3:17-cv-04738-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE,

v. MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXCLUDE,

AND MOTIONS TO SEAL

GOPRO, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 472, 473, 474, 475, 490, 495 Defendant.

12 INTRODUCTION In this patent infringement suit, plaintiff Contour IP Holdings, LLC (“Contour”), alleges that defendant GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro”), infringes claims 11, 12, 14, 15, and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 8,890,954 and claims 4 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 8,896,694. GoPro denies that it infringed and claims that the patents are invalid. The patents relate to mountable and viewfinderless point-of- view video cameras with capabilities to wirelessly connect to personal portable devices. A jury trial is set for later this year, depending on the state of the COVID-19 pandemic. This Order addresses the parties’motions in limine and GoPro’s motion to strike the supplemental report and exclude the testimony of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.