Isozaki

Isozaki v. Resolute Capital Partners LTD

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20214:21-cv-00091California589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DONALD ISOZAKI, Case No. 21-cv-091-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE v.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER AND GRANTING REQUEST TO

R etE aS lO ., LUTE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD. LLC, S PH RO ELR IT ME IN N AT RIM Y E I NO JN U NM CO TIT OIO N N FOR

11 Defendants. Dkt. No. 6

13 Plaintiff Donald Isozaki has filed an ex parte motion (Dkt. No. 6) for temporary restraining 14 order and request for an order to show cause and set a hearing on a preliminary injunction to 15 restrain defendants Resolute Capital Partners LTD., LLC, Resolute Capital Managers, LLC, 16 Legacy Energy, LLC, PetroRock Mineral Holdings, LLC, HomeBound Resources, LLC, 17 HomeBound, Inc., Home Bound Financial Group, LP, Mercury Operating, LLC, Stefan Toth, Ted 18 Etheredge, Pablo Cortez, and Thomas Powell (collectively, the “RCP Parties”) from transferring, 19 removing, or disposing of $600,000 from their accounts in any other manner other than to transfer 20 Isozaki’s retirement savings back into…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.