Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20213:17-cv-05659California1,741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FINJAN, INC., Plaintiff, No. C 17-05659 WHA

v.

JUNIPER NETWORK, INC., et al., ORDER RE REQUEST

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

Defendants.

15 INTRODUCTION Following affirmance by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit of the rulings in this patent infringement suit, the prevailing defendant moves for attorney’s fees. Because this case did stand out as exceptional in certain respects, a limited award of attorney’s fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 is warranted. STATEMENT Patent owner Finjan, Inc. filed this infringement suit in September 2017, asserting several patents against Juniper Network, Inc. Motion practice led to the “patent showdown.” Each party chose its strongest patent claim, Finjan its best case for infringement and Juniper its best case for noninfringement or invalidity, and moved for early summary judgment in June 2018. Juniper prevailed on noninfringement of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.