Ozim

Ozim v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20214:20-cv-05465California965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAISY OZIM, Case Nos. 20-cv-05353-PJH; Plaintiff, 20-cv-05465-PJH v.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN PREJUDICE FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 11 Defendants.

13 On August 19, 2020, the court granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and reviewed the complaint pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Dkt. 10. In her complaint, plaintiff alleged that San Francisco Board of Supervisor Matt Haney (“Haney”) collaborated with two assailants to “gangstalk, silence, and murder” her. Dkt. 1 (Compl.) at 5. According to plaintiff, Haney took this action because she forced him into a sort of ultimatum—namely, (1) Haney “dispel” the slander he had previously made against her or (2) she would take legal action against him. Id. Plaintiff attempted to contact defendants District Attorney Chesa Boudin (“Boudin”) and City Attorney Dennis Herrera (“Herrera”) to investigate Haney. Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.