Conner

Conner v. Quora, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20215:18-cv-07597California398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JERI CONNOR, Case No. 18-cv-07597-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE

PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE

QUORA, INC., JUDGE Defendant. [Re: ECF 209]

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Jeri Connor’s motion for relief from a non-dispositive pretrial order of Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72-2. See Mot., ECF 209. Ms. Connor challenges Judge Cousins’s denial of her motion to compel further document production on the basis that he failed to apply the three-part test for implied waiver as set forth in Home Indemnity Co. v. Lane Powell Moss & Miller, 43 F.3d 1322, 1326 (9th Cir. 1995). Mot. 1. After the Court ordered Quora to respond to Ms. Connor’s motion, Quora filed an opposition brief arguing that Judge Cousins correctly decided that Quora did not impliedly waive its work product…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.