Barocio-Mendez

Barocio-Mendez v. Warden of Immigration Detention Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20214:20-cv-06110California1,834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

10 This action was reassigned from a magistrate judge to the undersigned in light of a recent Ninth Circuit decision. Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 12 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his ongoing detention by the United States Immigration and Customs 13 Enforcement (“ICE”) at the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility in Bakersfield, California. He 14 has paid the full filing fee. Dkt. 1. He also seeks appointment of counsel, a stay of removal, and 15 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Dkts. 3-5. Because 16 Petitioner has paid the $5.00 filing fee, his IFP application is DENIED as moot. Dkt. 3.

II. BACKGROUND

18 Petitioner was born in Mexico, admitted into the United States on or about 1977, and is not 19 a citizen of the United States. On an unstated date, petitioner was convicted of attempted murder. 20 Beginning on May 29, 2018, ICE “refuse[d] to establish a bond” due to his aforementioned 21 criminal conviction. Petitioner has since remained in ICE custody without bond. On or about 22 August 24, 2018, an Immigration Judge ordered Petitioner removed from the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.