Pangea Legal Services v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20213:20-cv-09253California5,126 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PANGEA LEGAL SERVICES, et al., Case No. 20-cv-09253-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Re: Dkt. No. 27 SECURITY, et al., 11 Defendants.

IMMIGRATION EQUALITY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-09258-JD Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 13 v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY, et al., Defendants.

In these two related actions, plaintiff immigration and asylum services organizations sue to block the implementation of a final rule that was issued last month by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ). The rule, titled Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removal; Credible Fear and Reasonable Fear Review, 85 Fed. Reg. 80274, 8 C.F.R. parts 208, 235, 1003, 1208, 1235 (Dec. 11, 2020) (Rule), would make sweeping changes to the United States’ asylum system and is scheduled to go into effect on January 11, 2021. Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.