Conner

Conner v. Quora, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20215:18-cv-07597California490 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JERI CONNOR, Case No. 18-cv-07597-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE A

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

QUORA, INC., Defendant.

12 Defendant Quora filed a motion asking for, among other things, leave to file for reconsideration of one fact issue that was before the Court for Quora’s motion for summary judgment. See Mot., ECF 214. The Court DENIES Quora’s request seeking leave to file such a motion. Trial courts have the inherent power to reconsider, set aside, or amend interlocutory orders at any time prior to entry of a final judgment. Meas v. City & Cty. of San Francisco, 681 F. Supp. 2d 1128, 1143 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (citing Sch. Dist. No. 5 v. Lundgren, 259 F.2d 101, 105 (9th Cir. 1958)). “In this judicial district, Civil Local Rule 7–9 provides a procedure whereby a litigant dissatisfied with an interlocutory ruling may seek leave to file a motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.