Hill

Hill v. Brooks

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20214:20-cv-04026California2,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA SPENCER HILL,

Case No. 20-cv-04026-YGR (PR) Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE v. TO AMEND

SUMER BROOKS,

7 Respondent.

I. INTRODUCTION This action was reassigned from a magistrate judge to the undersigned in light of a recent Ninth Circuit decision. Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an incomplete habeas corpus petition form. See Dkt. 1. His petition is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243 and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Petitioner has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), which is GRANTED. Dkt. 5. II. DISCUSSION This Court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.