Tolentino

Tolentino v. Gillig, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20213:20-cv-07427California4,430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RONALD TOLENTINO, individually, and Case No. 20-cv-07427-MMC on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; REMANDING STATE LAW CLAIMS

GILLIG, LLC,

11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court are the following two motions: (1) plaintiff Ronald Tolentino’s (“Tolentino”) “Motion to Remand,” filed November 6, 2020, and (2) defendant Gillig, LLC’s (“Gillig”) “Motion to Dismiss,” filed December 4, 2020. Both motions have been fully briefed. Having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND In the instant action, Tolentino, who was employed by Gillig as a maintenance worker from May 2002 to June 2020 (see Compl. ¶ 7), alleges Gillig “failed to pay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.