Greco

Greco v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20214:20-cv-02698California2,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 LUCIA GRECO, CASE NO. 4:20-cv-02698-YGR

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

vs. TO STAY PENDING APPEAL

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., Re: Dkt. Nos. 39, 40 Defendants.

11 Plaintiff Lucia Greco brings this action for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Act against defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Raisier LLC, and Rasier-CA LLC (collectively, “Uber”). (Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 55-76.) Uber moved to compel arbitration, and the Court denied the motion. (Dkt. No. 32 (“Order”).) Now before the Court is Uber’s motion to stay pending appeal of the motion to compel Order. (Dkt. Nos. 39, 40.) Having carefully considered the pleadings and the papers, the Court DENIES Uber’s motion.1 I. BACKGROUND Ms. Greco alleges that Uber drivers refused to provide her rides due to her guide dog. (Compl. ¶ 36.) Since Ms. Greco agreed to Uber’s user agreement upon sign-up, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.