Umeda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TOMOMI UMEDA, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02926-SVK

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. Re: Dkt. No. 39 TESLA INC., Defendant.

Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiffs Tomomi Umeda and Miyu Umeda (“Plaintiffs”) for reconsideration of the Court’s September 23, 2020 Order granting Defendant Tesla Inc.’s motion to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens (Dkt. 34 – the “Order”). Dkt. 39. Tesla opposes the motion for reconsideration. Dkt. 40. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court deems this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. Plaintiffs have failed to establish any grounds for altering, amending, or setting aside the Order, and the Court therefore DENIES the motion for reconsideration. I. DISCUSSION A complete factual background of this case is discussed in the Order and is not repeated here. See Dkt. 34 at 2. The following dates are relevant to certain of…