Bumpus

Bumpus v. Realogy Holdings Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20213:19-cv-03309California1,134 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 RONALD CHINITZ, et al., Case No. 3:19-cv-03309-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 6 Re: Dkt. No. 77 REALOGY HOLDINGS CORP., et al., Defendants.

9 This putative class action alleges multiple violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227, and California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq. Dkt. No. 55. The gravamen of the second amended complaint (SAC) is that defendants Realogy Holdings Corp., Realogy Intermediate Holdings, Realogy Group, Realogy Services Group, and Realogy Brokerage Group (collectively Realogy) operate a national conglomerate of real estate companies, including Coldwell Banker, whose agents make cold calls to potential clients listed on the National Do Not Call Registry (NDNCR) maintained by the Federal Trade Commission. Defendant Mojo Dialing Solutions LLC is said to be an autodialing company used by Realogy in connection with the calls. Realogy asks to dismiss the SAC under Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.