Roshan

Roshan v. Lawrence

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20213:20-cv-04770California5,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PEYMAN ROSHAN, Case No. 20-cv-04770-AGT

Plaintiff, ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS, (2) DENYING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO AMEND, (3) DENYING

MOTION TO DEFER

MELANIE J. LAWRENCE, et al., CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO

DISMISS

Defendants. 11 Re: ECF Nos. 9, 28, 30

13 In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, Peyman Roshan, a California lawyer facing discipline by the State Bar of California (“State Bar”) for numerous counts of professional misconduct, seeks to enjoin his ongoing disciplinary proceedings and an order declaring the State Bar’s disciplinary rules and procedures unconstitutional. The State Bar’s Office of Chief Trial Counsel (“OCTC”) and the head of OCTC, Melanie J. Lawrence (“Defendants”), have moved to dismiss, without leave to amend, on abstention grounds under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). ECF No. 9. After that motion was fully briefed, Roshan filed a motion for leave to amend (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.