Lona's Lil Eats, LLC v. DoorDash, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20213:20-cv-06703California9,953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LONA'S LIL EATS, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-06703-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 29 DOORDASH, INC., Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, Plaintiff brings claims for purported violations of the Lanham Act, California’s false advertising statute, and California’s unfair competition statute, alleging that Defendant misrepresents to consumers that it provides delivery and pick-up services for non- partner restaurants and then misrepresents the restaurants are closed, do not offer delivery services, or are unavailable for pick-up orders. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 29. Plaintiff filed an Opposition, ECF No. 30, and Defendant filed a Reply, ECF No. 31. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the January 21, 2021 hearing. See Civ. L.R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.