Gudgel

Gudgel v. The Clorox Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20214:20-cv-05712California3,488 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHANA GUDGEL, Case No. 20-cv-05712-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

THE CLOROX COMPANY,

Defendant.

13 Defendant The Clorox Company’s (“Clorox” or “defendant”) motion to dismiss came on for hearing before this court on December 9, 2020. Plaintiff Shana Gudgel (“plaintiff”) appeared through her counsel, William Wright and Daniel Levinson. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Emily Johnson Henn. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and relevant authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion for the following reasons. BACKGROUND This is a product labeling case, brought as a putative class action, arising out of Clorox’s “Splash-less Bleach” product. Plaintiff’s central allegation is that the product’s packaging and marketing would lead a reasonable consumer to believe that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.