Drevaleva

Drevaleva v. Beeler

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20213:20-cv-00642California319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA Case No. 20-cv-00642-JD

DREVALEVA,

9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE IFP STATUS 10 v. 11 LAUREL BEELER, et al., 12 Defendants.

13 In Tatyana Drevaleva’s pending appeal, the Ninth Circuit made a limited referral back to this Court to determine whether a prior grant of in forma pauperis status should continue, or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. Dkt. No. 39. Drevaleva’s appeal is frivolous. In this case, Drevaleva has sued Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler for her rulings in, and handling of, Drevaleva’s previous case against her former employer and others, Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-07414-LB, to which Judge Beeler was assigned as presiding judge. Judge Beeler’s order dismissing Drevaleva’s complaint in that case was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit in Case No. 17-16382. In any event, Drevaleva’s complaint in this case takes aim at Judge Beeler’s actions as a judicial officer, and as such, it is squarely barred by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.