Dunham

Dunham v. Najem

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20213:18-cv-04467California495 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JOHN F. DUNHAM, Case No. 18-cv-04467-AGT

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO CONTINUE EXPERT

DISCOVERY DEADLINES

COUNTY OF MONTEREY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 142 Defendants.

Before the Court is John Dunham’s motion to continue the current expert discovery deadlines. At the motion hearing, Dunham confirmed that he won’t be retaining a medical expert to testify at trial. He will instead be relying on the testimony of his treating physicians. Because of this choice, he has less control over the pace of expert discovery. He must wait to be seen and treated by medical providers who have busy schedules, schedules that have been further strained by Covid-19. So that Dunham can be evaluated by the medical providers he is scheduled to see, the Court will allow a reasonable extension of the expert discovery deadlines. The parties are directed to meet and confer on a revised schedule, and to file their proposal with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.