Bennett

Bennett v. Prop. 47 Public Defenders Deaprtment

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20215:19-cv-08166California634 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID BENNETT,

Case No. 19-08166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER LIFTING STAY; DENYING v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM;

DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

PROP. 47 PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. (Docket No. 15)

17 18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking money damages for unlawful confinement. Dkt. No. 1. The 20 Court referred this matter to the Federal Pro Se Program to find counsel for the limited 21 purpose of conducting a competency hearing because there was a substantial questions 22 regarding his mental incompetence based on an order from the Superior Court of Butte 23 County finding him incompetent to stand trial. Dkt. No. 16. The Court found this 24 document triggered its duty was inquiry under Rule 17(c) of the Federal Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.