Anderson

Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20213:19-cv-04618California11,330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

WINSTON R. ANDERSON, Case No. 19-CV-04618-LHK CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, and all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING WITH LEAVE TO

Plaintiffs, AMEND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS COUNTS I-VI OF

v. PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED

COMPLAINT

INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiffs Winston Anderson and Christopher Sulyma (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, bring this action against twenty-one named individual Defendants and three committees of the Intel Corporation, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts I–VI of Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint, ECF No. 99 (“Mot.”). Having considered the parties’ briefing, the relevant law, and

1 Defendants’ motion to dismiss contains a notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.