Silbersher

Silbersher v. Allergan plc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20213:18-cv-03018California2,122 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZACHARY SILBERSHER, et al., Case No. 18-cv-03018-JCS Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. CERTIFY ORDER FOR IMMEDIATE APPEAL AND FOR STAY, VACATING ALLERGAN INC., et al., FEBRUARY 5, 2021 MOTION HEARING AND CONTINUING Defendants. FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO JUNE 4, 2021

Re: Dkt. No. 136

13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff-Relator Zachary Silbersher (“Relator”) brings this action against two sets of defendants: 1) the Allergan Defendants (“Allergan”); and 2) the Adamas Defendants (“Adamas”). He asserts claims under the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, based on allegations that Adamas and Allergan misled the United States Patent Office (“PTO”) into issuing invalid patents protecting the drugs Namenda XR® and Namzaric®, thus…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.