IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20213:20-cv-02155California565 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case No. 20-CV-02155-LHK
IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
COMMUNICATIONS INC. PRIVACY MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-
DISPOSITIVE ORDER OF
LITIGATION MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15 Re: Dkt. No. 142
17 On December 7, 2020, the parties briefed United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen on whether the protective order in this litigation should include a certain provision from this district’s Model Protective Order for Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential Information and/or Trade Secrets (“Model Order”). ECF No. 135. Specifically, Plaintiffs opposed including the Model Order’s provision on disclosing “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” documents to experts. See id. at 1–2 (challenging Model Order § 7.4). On December 16, 2020, Judge van Keulen issued an Order Regarding Protective Order and FRE 502 Discovery Disputes, which…