IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20213:20-cv-02155California565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case No. 20-CV-02155-LHK

IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

COMMUNICATIONS INC. PRIVACY MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-

DISPOSITIVE ORDER OF

LITIGATION MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Re: Dkt. No. 142

17 On December 7, 2020, the parties briefed United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen on whether the protective order in this litigation should include a certain provision from this district’s Model Protective Order for Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential Information and/or Trade Secrets (“Model Order”). ECF No. 135. Specifically, Plaintiffs opposed including the Model Order’s provision on disclosing “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” documents to experts. See id. at 1–2 (challenging Model Order § 7.4). On December 16, 2020, Judge van Keulen issued an Order Regarding Protective Order and FRE 502 Discovery Disputes, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.