Quan

Quan v. Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20213:20-cv-08118California3,717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division LAM VI QUAN, Case No. 20-cv-08118-LB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING HABEAS

v. PETITION

WILLIAM P. BARR, et al., Re: ECF No. 1 Defendants. 17 INTRODUCTION The petitioner, a citizen of Vietnam and a lawful permanent resident of the United States, petitioned under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for his release from immigration custody on the ground that (1) he did not receive an adequate bond hearing because in denying him bond, the immigration judge (IJ) did not consider the age of his conviction or his cognitive impairments, thus violating his due- process rights, and (2) as to the cognitive impairments, the IJ’s denial violated the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794.1 The court denies the petition because the IJ considered and weighed all evidence in reaching his decision.

1 Pet. – ECF No. 1; Mem. – id. at 31–33 (¶¶ 1–8), 62 (¶ 98); Traverse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.