GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership v. City of Berkeley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20214:20-cv-05460California5,137 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 20-cv-05460-DMR

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE v. COMPLAINT 10 CITY OF BERKELEY, Re: Dkt. No. 30 11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership dba Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) moves for leave to amend and supplement the complaint. [Docket No. 30.] Intervenor-Defendants Berryman Reservoir Neighbors (“BRN”) oppose the motion. [Docket No. 31.] Defendant City of Berkeley (“Berkeley”) did not file an opposition. This motion is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND A. Original Complaint This is an action for declaratory judgment under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TCA”), 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7). Verizon filed a complaint against Berkeley on August 6, 2020, alleging that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.