Poorsina
Poorsina v. Peak Forclosure Services, Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALI POORSINA, Case No. 20-cv-08282-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
PEAK FORCLOSURE SERVICES, INC, Re: Dkt. No. 6 Defendant.
12 Pro se plaintiff Ali Poorsina brings this action against defendant Peak Foreclosure Services, Inc. (“Peak”) for claims arising out a foreclosure sale. Peak had previously interpleaded the surplus funds from its foreclosure of real property in San Francisco in an action before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, In re 1563 28th Ave., San Francisco, CA 94112, Case No. 3:19- cv-01385-LB, in which Poorsina was a claimant and raised causes of action similar to the ones in this case that Judge Beeler rejected before she entered judgment. Poorsina’s claims under California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) are meritless because they are barred by the one-year statute of limitations and because…