Philips

Philips v. Munchery Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20213:19-cv-00469California7,323 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JOSHUA JAMES EATON PHILIPS, et al., Case No. 19-cv-00469-JSC

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS

v. ACTION SETTLEMENT, MOTION

FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS,

MUNCHERY INC., AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE

AWARD

Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 63,

14 Plaintiffs Joshua James Eaton Phillips and Christina Brooks bring this putative class action 15 under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 16 2101(a)(2), and its California state law counterpart, California Labor Code §§ 1400 et seq. (“CAL- 17 WARN”) (together, “WARN Acts”), against their former employer, Defendant Munchery, Inc. 18 (“Munchery”). Plaintiffs allege that Munchery failed to provide its employees with written notice 19 60 days prior to their termination, as required under the WARN Acts. In February 2020, the 20 parties reached a settlement of Plaintiffs’ claims. Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ unopposed 21 motion for final approval of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.