Cisneros

Cisneros v. Vangilder

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20214:16-cv-00735California6,575 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL CISNEROS, Case No. 16-cv-00735-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES J.VANGILDER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 223 Defendants. DANIEL MANRIQUEZ, Case No. 16-cv-01320-HSG Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No. 225 v. J.VANGILDER, et al., Defendants. 17 Pending before the Court are the motions for attorneys’ fees and costs filed in two related matters, Cisneros v. Vangilder, No. 16-cv-0735-HSG, Dkt. No. 223, and Manriquez v. Vangilder, No. 16-cv-1320-HSG, Dkt. No. 225. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff Manriquez’s motion for attorneys’ fees, and DENIES Plaintiff Cisneros’ motion. I. BACKGROUND The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.