Miller v. Infinite Percent Partners LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20214:20-cv-02253California2,214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LISA MILLER, Case No. 20-cv-02253-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 34 INFINITE PERCENT PARTNERS LLC, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 34, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 32. Plaintiff also requests leave to amend her complaint. Dkt. No. 46. For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the request for leave to amend is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Dr. Lisa Miller, is a naturopathic medical doctor with a medical practice in the Bay Area. Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 13. In March 2019, Defendant Infinite Percent Partners’ (“IPP”) Chief Operating Officer, Michelle Van Otten, approached Plaintiff about employing her as IPP’s Chief Medical Officer with a focus on scientific cannabis research. Id. ¶ 15. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants asked her to join their start up…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.