Williams v. Santa Clara County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20213:20-cv-04614California299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 ANTOINE WILLIAMS, Case No. 20-cv-04614-JD Petitioner, y ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 2 SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Respondent. 10 Petitioner, a detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § || 2254. Petitioner was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete

< 13 || application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was allowed twenty-eight days to

v 14 || either pay the fee or file a proper application with all the required documents. More than twenty- O || eight days has passed and petitioner has not paid the fee or filed a complete application to proceed Q 16 || IFP. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice and petitioner’s incomplete motion to proceed

|| IFP (Docket No. 2) is DENIED.' A certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2021 20

JAMES TO

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.