Hamid

Hamid v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20213:20-cv-01601California8,262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NAZIR HAMID, Case No. 20-cv-01601-VC

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS OF FACT AND

v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE JUDGMENT AND DENYING

COMPANY, et al., DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTION

FOR JUDGMENT

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 30,

Nazir Hamid brings this suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act based on Metropolitan Life Insurance’s refusal to pay him short-term disability (STD) and long-term disability (LTD) income benefits under his employment benefits plan. Hamid applied for STD and LTD benefits based on chronic pain in his face and head that he says prevents him from working his job as a mortgage loan officer at Bank of America. His medical records reflect that his pain began in the early 2000s, that it became increasingly severe around 2016, and that it became debilitating in 2018, forcing him to stop working in October of that year. Hamid consulted various specialists, including otolaryngologists, neurologists, allergists, and rheumatologists. He received many rounds of allergy and Botox…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.